The Ambient Reading Method. Is it worthy? : Eco Answers

See I am constantly on the
lookout for informative videos on
Alternative Energy Sources. This evening, I
ran across a very
excellent information that discusses Eco Energy Sources from a different
angle. Today’s amazing article is titled The Ambient Reading Method. Is it worthy? .
Question by : The Ambient Reading Method. Is it worthy?
The Ambient Reading Method

Take a word : intelligence

let “t” represent a quadral latterant chart; an objective with four possible outcomes in category.

let “l” represent “as opposed to” (often times in the 2nd of the 3 parts of a noun’s name structure.

With the chart you can use both numbers and words to relate selective information collectively.

As all forces of energy always oppose another source selectively so does human psychology, of which math and speech have derived from.

Because there are 4 forces involved, they all differ, slightly relate to their neighboring force, and oppose their opposite side.

For example; algebraically,
“1″ will represent the slot of the top left corner.
“2″ will represent the slot of the top right corner.
“Alpha” will represent the slot of the bottom left corner.
“Beta” will represent the slot of the bottom right corner.

As logic occurs, Alpha is first, then beta, then 1 and 2, as Alpha and Beta are a part of the nature of the human mind and 1 and 2 are a part of the

numerical system; a creation of humans.

“1″ and “Alpha” are not the same because 1 is a dominant where as Alpha is simply the first of two.
“1″ and “2″ are relevant because they are of Intellect.
“Alpha,” and “Beta,” are relevant because they are of Psychology.
“1″ and Beta” and complete opposites.

“2″ and “Alpha” are complete opposites.

“2″ and “Beta” are relevant because they are both the alt way of life; flow of energy but they differ as 2 is second place to 1 but Beta, is as great as

Alpha. It simply occurs after the place of it.

IN|ell
I |gence

But what does this mean?

As the Ambient Method prescribes:
IN is the combination of I and N. I is the first degree of subjection and N is representive of “nothing,” which is simply a misleading word.
ell is the combination of energy, opposition, and opposition. So, ell = Energy opposed squared.
I, once again, is the first degree of subjection.
gence is the combination of g, unknown at this time, e is energy, n is nothing, c is completion, and e is energy. If you put “gence” all together it is

equal to “The energy of the unknown, over falsities to complete energy.”
Put that all together as one and you will find this to be the solution:(ALPHA) A mistake of mine; energy opposed squared (because the user often

finds themselves seeking relevance over fact), (BETA) “The energy of the unknown, over falsities to complete energy(in this case e=pursuit of

knowledge).
Anytime now….World…anytime now…
honestly!, how will i concluded, if not proved by a reply. Will you not evoke me to explain my solid belief on how we all, as a world, share the same unseen (to most) language?

Best answer:

Answer by samy
fact to be known

Add your own answer in the comments!

You may view the latest post at
The Ambient Reading Method. Is it worthy?

Best regards,
JamesGallo
ekonenargi@gmail.com